Jump to content

Talk:Worshippers Way

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

POV

[edit]

This article appears to fail NPOV entirely. There are almost no secondary sources and the sources that are utilized only for the anti-Israel perspective. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 03:49, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that a template was placed right after the very first edit of the article shows that it is not serious and just an act of hasbara and hypocrisy. --Wickey-nl (talk) 15:02, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Awesome point, but when you get a chance please respond to the actual issue raised herein. Thanks. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 02:44, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I am happy that you acknowledge, it is a valid argument. --Wickey-nl (talk) 17:29, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Brewcrewer, do you have, besides hollow phrases, something sensible to say? What POV does actually trouble you? --Wickey-nl (talk) 10:46, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious claims

[edit]

This article seems to be based to a large degree (perhaps entirely) on a court case from 2002. That case makes it clear that the road/way/path in question was in existence long before the 2002 ambush. 2002 Hebron ambush also describes the road as already in existence before the ambush. Is there more to this article than a discussion of the court case that centered around expansion plans of the road? It doesn't seem that notable. Brad Dyer (talk) 19:00, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Amazing. Suggesting that the subject is not notable evokes the suspicion that you have other intensions. Yes, there were already roads, but the question is not simply about the expansion of a few roads and the demolition of a few houses. I suspect that you are fully aware of that. --Wickey-nl (talk) 10:42, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
if the subject is the road as its names implies, the article needs significant rewriting to address, as just one example, the fact that the road existed prior to the 2002 events. If the subject is the expansion of the road following the 2002 ambush and the subsequent court case, I don't think that is notable enough for an encyclopedia article. Brad Dyer (talk) 16:06, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]